World News

Monday, June 8, 2009

Sotomayor's Porn Trial

PrintPrintEmailEmailPDF   PDF

McClatchy's Mike Doyle digs up Farrell v. Burke, a case from 2006 involving a sex offender who had violated his parole by purchasing porn. The salacious details, including Sotomayor reading excerpts from Scum: True Homosexual Experiences, are here. (Unfortunately for the culture warriors, she ultimately sided with the state.) Doyle also highlights this classic exchange between the sex offender's attorney and parole officer:



MR. NATHANSON: Are you saying, for example, that that condition of parole would prohibit Mr. Farrell from possessing, say, Playboy magazine?



P.O. BURKE: Yes.



MR. NATHANSON: Are you saying that that condition of parole would prohibit Mr. Farrell from possessing a photograph of Michelangelo['s] David?



P.O. BURKE: What is that?



MR. NATHANSON: Are you familiar with that sculpture?



P.O. BURKE: No.



MR. NATHANSON: If I tell you it's a large sculpture of a nude youth with his genitals exposed and visible, does that help to refresh your memory of what that is?



P.O. BURKE: If he possessed that, yes, he would be locked up for that.







Sotomayor's Porn Trial

[Source: Good Times Society - by The American Illuminati]


Sotomayor's Porn Trial

[Source: Advertising News]


Sotomayor's Porn Trial

[Source: The Daily News]

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home